Legal Opinion

Matter of Guardianship of Reyes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 31, 1986No. 2 CA-CV 5759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

In this proceeding appellant attacks the Arizona guardianship laws as unconstitutional on the grounds that the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence rather than by clear and convincing evidence, that the definition of “incapacitated person” is vague and overbroad, and that the powers of a guardian are overbroad. Although none of these issues was raised below, we will address them because they are of statewide concern. Barsema v. Susong, Ariz., (2 CA-CV 5794, filed October 9, 1986).

The appointment of a guardian often involves significant loss…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re BoyerUtah Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Conservatorship of GrovesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. Matter of Guardianship of HedinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6982Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Geer v. OrdwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Hedin v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API