Matter of Guardianship of Reyes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.
In this proceeding appellant attacks the Arizona guardianship laws as unconstitutional on the grounds that the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence rather than by clear and convincing evidence, that the definition of “incapacitated person” is vague and overbroad, and that the powers of a guardian are overbroad. Although none of these issues was raised below, we will address them because they are of statewide concern. Barsema v. Susong, Ariz., (2 CA-CV 5794, filed October 9, 1986).
The appointment of a guardian often involves significant loss…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re BoyerUtah Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Conservatorship of GrovesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Matter of Guardianship of HedinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6982Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Geer v. OrdwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Hedin v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.