Legal Opinion

State v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1962No. 16091PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This appeal again presents the question of the admissibility of testimony in regard to alleged comparable sales in a condemnation suit.

This is the second appeal in the case. For the opinion in the first appeal see Hays v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 342 S.W.2d 167. For a related case see State v. Morse, Tex.Civ.App., 342 S.W.2d 165.

Appellees admitted that appellants had complied with all the prerequisites and requirements for condemnation. The only questions remaining were issues of value. Nevertheless the trial extended over a period of ten days. The statement of facts covers…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  4. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of University of Tex. Sys. v. PuettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Texas Power & Light Company v. LovinggoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Texas Electric Service Company v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Texas Sanitation Co. v. MarekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. City of Houston v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API