Legal Opinion

Egan v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. 22176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

A car of stock was shipped by the plaintiff ■ from Hyannis to South Omaha on or about the 2d day of *568November, 1919, the shipper sending a caretaker along to look after the said stock. The caretaker last saw the cattle at or near Seward, Nebraska, when they were standing np and apparently in good condition. When the shipment was unloaded at Omaha, two of the cows were found to be cripples and had to be removed from the car and disposed of as such, to the plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $106.70. The action is upon the assumption that the railroad company must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Cleve v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Starr v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API