Legal Opinion

Hutt v. Robbins

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 1, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*102The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kolovsky, J. A. D.

Since January 1, 1964 the form of government of the Township of Woodbridge has been “Mayor-council plan P” under the Optional Municipal Charter Law, N. J. 8. A. 40 :69A—1 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the “Eaulkner Act”).

Among the departments created by the township ordinance known as the Administrative Code of Woodbridge is the Department of Law, headed by defendant Robbins as Director of Law. The Code also provides that within that department “there shall be a law officer known as the municipal solicitor.” The office is a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Indyk v. KlinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Mele v. FahyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
  3. Angelo v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. DeSoto v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  5. City Council v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API