Legal Opinion

Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. Logan, Evans & Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1895No. 222PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Armstrong County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

—Frank and Louis Dysart were partners under the firm name of Dysart Bros., doing a mercantile business at Glande and Panhandle City, Texas. They were indebted to the plaintiffs and defendants, and to one W. E. Grinnell, as well as other people. The firm was insolvent, and on the 10th day of February, 1890, conveyed their stocks of goods at both places to W. B. Grinnell, in trust, to be by him sold and the proceeds applied to the payment of the debt due to himself, Grinnell, and expenses of administering the trust, and if there was any surplus, then it was to be paid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CullersTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brownson v. ScanlanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hamburg v. O. P. Wood & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Redus v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. D. Sullivan & Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. McBrayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Star v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Sherrod v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API