Legal Opinion

Uhl v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1926No. 10291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BETHEA, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of receiving

stolen property knowing it to have been stolen at the time he received it, and his punishment was assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The indictment in this case contains two counts, the first count charging the appellant with theft of the property, and the second count with receiving and concealing the said property. He was convicted under the second count.

Appellant’s bill of exceptions No. 1 complains of the trial court’s refusal to quash the second count in the indictment, for the reason that it cannot be determined from a reading…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Forrester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API