Legal Opinion
Baker v. Data Dynamics, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided April 15, 1983No. C-C-82-591-MPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, District Judge.
Robert G. Baker brought this pro se suit on behalf of himself and Mecklenburg Enterprises, Inc. (“MEI”) of which Baker is sole shareholder and president. Baker has also named himself as plaintiff as “attorney in fact” for Nick Popich, who is described in paragraph five of the complaint as the “owner of the [MEI] common stock,” but who, according to Baker, actually has only a “residual interest” in the stock;
Although the allegations of the complaint are not at all clear, they appear to suggest the following facts and events:
In 1979, MEI participated in merger…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vreugdenhil v. HoekstraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Mosley v. Meritor Mortgage Corp.-East (In Re Mosley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Dinkins v. Margaretten & Co. (In Re Dinkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Battle v. Alpha Chemical and Paper Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Bauman v. BishDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.