Legal Opinion
Mosley v. Meritor Mortgage Corp.-East (In Re Mosley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 21, 1988No. 19-10415PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant adversarial proceeding presents, on its surface, a rather commonplace sort of matter: a Chapter 13 debtor challenging the Proof of Claim of his mortgage company on the grounds that (1) The Mortgagee sought to impose unwarranted attorney’s fees and costs arising out of a pre-petition foreclosure suit; and (2) The Mortgagee is subject to recoupment due to violations of the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “TILA”), in the disclosure statement given to the Debtor by the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- C. Russell Kelleran, Jr., Eighteen Mile Corporation v. Slavko Andrijevic, A/K/A Al AndrieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re BrantzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Herbert v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Herbert)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Rowe v. Conners (In Re Rowe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Smith v. Kissell Co. (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Vitelli v. Cheltenham Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Vitelli)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.