Legal Opinion

Idaho Conservation League v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1996No. 95-36293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 F.3d 1345

26 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,650, 96 Cal. Daily Op.

Serv. 5822,

96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9501

IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE; and The Wilderness Society,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Jack Ward THOMAS, in his official capacity as Chief of the

United States Forest Service; Dan Glickman, in his official

capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture;

and United States Forest Service, an agency of the U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees,

and

Intermountain Forest Industry Association, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 95-36293.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Idaho Conservation League v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1995
  3. Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Idaho Conservation League v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pronsolino v. MarcusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  2. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API