Legal Opinion
Pronsolino v. Marcus
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 30, 2000No. C 99-01828 WHAPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING AUTHORITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO LIST SUBSTANDARD RIVERS AND WATERS AND TO ISSUE TMDLS FOR THEM
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this case of first impression, the issue is whether Section 303(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, later renamed the Clean Water Act, authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to determine “total maximum daily loads” for rivers and waters polluted only by logging and agricultural runoff and/or other nonpoint sources rather than by any…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- North Carolina Shellfish Growers Ass'n v. Holly Ridge Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.