Conoco, Inc. v. Andrews Van Lines, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This is an action by Plaintiff to recover for accidental damage to and loss of goods shipped in interstate commerce pursuant to a contract between Plaintiff and Defendant Andrews Van Lines, Inc. (Andrews). Defendant International Van & Storage, Inc. (International) is alleged to have been transporting the goods at the time of the damage and loss of goods as the agent of Defendant Andrews. This action was originally commenced in the Oklahoma County District Court and removed to this Court by Defendants. Defendant Andrews generally denies all of Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HaroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Praxair, Inc. v. Mayflower Transit Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Rafaella Gallery, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- KLLM, Inc. v. Watson Pharma, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009