Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barnes, K., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2016No. 36 EAP 2015PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*495OPINION

JUSTICE BAER

This appeal presents the issue of whether a challenge, on direct appeal, alleging that a mandatory minimum sentence violates Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013) (requiring that any fact that increases a mandatory minimum sentence be deemed an element of an aggravated offense necessitating pre-trial notice to a defendant, the submission of the fact to a factfinder, and the factfinder’s conclusion that the fact has been established beyond a reasonable doubt), implicates the “legality” of a sentence for issue preservation purposes, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. Washington, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Dimatteo, P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. BeboutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. GolsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. MonarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API