Legal Opinion
State v. Turmelle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-196PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant appeals from her conviction following a bench trial in the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) for possession of a controlled drug with intent to sell. RSA 318-B:2, I (Supp. 1988). She contends that the court erred: (1) in denying her pretrial motion to suppress evidence that she alleges was the product of a search in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions; (2) in returning a guilty verdict based solely on circumstantial evidence; and (3) in denying her motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
On April 27, 1987, Val Sakamoto, a United States Department of Agriculture plant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Appeal of MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. PlanteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.