Legal Opinion

Haralson v. John Deere Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2003No. A03A0583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

John Deere Company (JDC), a division of Deere & Company, sued Tommy H. Haralson, Sr. on a guaranty he signed for the debts of Farmers Supply Store, Inc. Moving for summary judgment, Haralson argued that the guaranty fell within the Statute of Frauds (OCGA § 13-5-30 (2)) and was unenforceable in that it failed to identify the promisor and the promisee sufficiently. JDC cross-moved for summary judgment on all claims, including the Statute of Frauds defense. Denying Haralson’s motion and most of JDC’s motion, the court granted JDC’s motion in part and struck the Statute of Frauds…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Costanzo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Gatins v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Sawyer v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Deere Co. v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Haralson v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Haralson v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API