Legal Opinion
David Roberts v. City of Omaha
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2013No. 12-3426PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
David Roberts sued the City of Omaha (city) and four Omaha Police Department officers (officers) (collectively, defendants), alleging, among other claims, Fourth Amendment excessive force violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 794; and state tort law. The district court granted in part and denied in part (1) the officers’ motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and (2) the city’s motion for summary judgment. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Ronda Marsh v. Phelps CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Cody Walton v. Robert DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Nicole Haberle v. Daniel TroxellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Dustin Burnikel v. Michael FongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Dwain Smith v. Conway County, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.