Legal Opinion
Ali v. Hickman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2009No. 07-16731PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on July 7, 2009, and published at 571 F.3d 902, is hereby amended as follows:
1. [571 F.3d at 907], Replace -^‘reasonable” and demonstrated that the peremptory challenges had not been motivated by the juror’s race.> with < “reasonable.” >
2. [571 F.3d at 907], Replace < agreed with the trial court’s conclusion > with < concluded >.
With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Tashima and Timlin recommend denial.
The full court has been advised of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Steven Crittenden v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cook v. LaMarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Keith Jamerson v. Gail LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Averill Briggs v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Robert McDaniels v. Richard KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.