Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1984Published

1Dissent

*72Abrams, J.

(dissenting, with whom Liacos, J., and Nolan, J., join). This court has long adhered to the rule that, in suits by real estate brokers against property owners to recover commissions due for services performed, it is “for the jury to determine what the agreement of the parties was and whether the plaintiff complied with it.” McEvoy v. Ginsberg, 345 Mass. 733, 736 (1963). Boyle v. Goldenberg, 267 Mass. 24, 27 (1929). I perceive no reason why this rule should be inapplicable where the broker’s services are rendered in connection with a syndication of property.1 The jury’s verdict for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. DickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Boyle v. WenkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. CanonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API