Legal Opinion

Long v. City of Monroe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 35,514PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This appeal involves the validity of special assessments levied against appellees’ properties incident to widening Monroe street in the city of Monroe. The city charter provides that an improvement of this type shall not be ordered “unless the owners of a majority of the frontage to be' assessed shall petition therefor (section 161).” In the circuit court decree was entered restraining the assessments on the ground, among others, that the petitions for the improvement did not contain valid signatures of the owners of sufficient frontage to comply with the requirements of the city charter.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. City of Big Rapids v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Jeffrey v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hinkley v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Penfold v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bergman v. DykhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sweeney v. Adam Groth Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Postal v. Home State Bank for SavingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wiggins v. Argent Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API