Van Alstyne v. City of Amsterdam
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAngell, J.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover for damage to his property caused by the going out on June 11, 1917, of part of a distributing reservoir dam maintained by defendant. Defendant contends that it is not hable for the reasons, first, that in maintaining the dam it was acting in a governmental capacity; second, that the giving way of the dam was caused by an unprecedented flood which it could not be expected to guard against, and was in effect an act of God; and third, that it adopted plans for the dam made by a reputable and competent engineer, that the dam was constructed in accordance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- Urquhart v. . City of OgdensburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Oakes Manufacturing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lefrois v. . County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buda v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
- People v. RubinNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1939