Legal Opinion
Buda v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 28, 1950No. Claim No. 28688PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSylvester, J.
Claimant seeks to recover damages for the flooding of his farm situated north of the village of Canastota, in the town of Lenox, Madison County. His property consisted of thirty-eight acres of so-called muck land, which were drained by eight lateral and two main ditches flowing into Colton Ditch and thence into Cowaselon Creek. It is asserted that the flooding of claimant’s land was caused by the negligent manner in which the State reconstructed the Cowaselon Creek Aqueduct which carries the waters of the Brie Canal over the Cowaselon Creek at a point four and one-half miles southeast of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Sullivan v. . DunhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buda v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Doundoulakis v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Annin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Waldo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956