Legal Opinion

First Tennessee Bank, N.A. v. Mungan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 28, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

Summary judgment was entered for the bank based on overdrafts in defendants’ checking account.

Defendant Nancy Edmonds has appealed, insisting there are disputed issues of material fact and summary judgment was inappropriate. We agree, vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.

The record, in addition to pleadings, for purposes of summary judgment included a signature card signed by both defendants, a deposit agreement, the checks deposited in the defendants’ checking account and later dishonored and the affidavit of a bank employee which stated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. BradenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Pankow v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  3. John P. Saad & Sons, Inc. v. Nashville Thermal Transfer Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Herbert G. Garman and Beverly Garman v. Maurice Knox GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Douglas Equipment, Inc., a Corporation v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Mack Trucks, Inc., Third Party v. Cutler Metal Products Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. Hadley v. Citizen Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  3. Cameo Bobo v. City of Jackson, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  5. David H. McCord v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API