Schallard v. Eel River Steam Navigation Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant is a corporation formed under the laws of this state, and this action was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing two mortgages, aggregating the sum of $11,941.81, upon the steamer Ferndale, which was constructed by and is the property of the defendant. ,
Those mortgages and the notes, the payment of wjich the former were intended to secure, were executed in the name of that corporation by its president and secretary, with the corporate seal affixed. One of the loans of *145money was made about one year preceding the commencement of the present action, and the other about…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- S. Cal. Colony Assn. v. BustamenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Quinlan v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.