Legal Opinion

Torres v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 23, 1972No. 1 CA-IC 643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

This appeal by writ of certiorari calls into question whether petitioner’s industrial *405injury should he treated in the scheduled or unscheduled1 category.

On June 24, 1969, petitioner suffered an industrial accident as a result of being sprayed in the eyes with lime. A Notice of Permanent Disability was entered by the carrier on June 29, 1970, finding petitioner was entitled to be compensated for a 50 percent loss of vision for one eye as provided by A.R.S. § 23-1044, subsec. B, pars. 17 and 21 (a scheduled injury). A request for a hearing was timely filed and set for December…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sims v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Heidler v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Chavez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Fudge v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. McCarty v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Russell v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API