Legal Opinion
Galin v. Board of Estimate
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fein, J.
We are all agreed that the Board of Estimate properly and lawfully accepted and exercised jurisdiction to review the determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA), which had granted a zoning variance to the petitioner, respecting premises 113 East 39th Street in Manhattan owned by petitioner, a medical doctor, and where he maintains a practice in ophthalmology with several other doctors. However, Justice Yesawich, dissenting, concludes that the Board of Estimate erred when it found that the decision of the BSA was not supported by substantial evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cotroneo v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Envoy Towers Co. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Armil Realty Corp. v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Solomon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Montalbano v. SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Galin v. Board of EstimateNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- 35 Broadway Co. v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Russo v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.