Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1997No. CR 97-593PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

This is the second interlocutory appeal brought by the State in the same case. In State v. Johnson, 326 Ark. 660, 934 S.W.2d 499 (1996), we held that the trial court erred in suppressing appellee John Edward Johnson’s confession on the basis that he was denied the right to counsel of his own choosing to be present during an in-custody interrogation and reversed and remanded his case. In the present appeal, the State contends that the trial court erred in dismissing its charges against Johnson on the grounds that double-jeopardy principles barred state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Stephen G. KoonceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zawodniak v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Tipton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Abdulhakim Muhammad v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API