Legal Opinion

Stretton v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 9, 1991No. Nos. 91-1398, 91-1439PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The Code of Judicial Conduct in force in Pennsylvania states that candidates for a judicial office in an election may not announce their views on disputed legal or political issues. We predict that the state supreme court would construe the restriction to apply only to issues likely to come before the courts. Read in that fashion, the limitation meets constitutional standards and we, therefore, vacate an injunction entered by the district court striking down that provision of the Code. We will affirm the district court’s order sustaining the Code’s ban…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Coast Cities Truck Sales, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  3. Republican Party of Minnesota v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Ohio Council 8 American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. BrunnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API