Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Sanders
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1998No. J.D. 12PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
955 P.2d 369 (1998)
135 Wash.2d 175
In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Richard B. SANDERS, Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
No. J.D. 12.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued December 17, 1997.
Decided April 28, 1998.
Paul L. Lawrence, Seattle, Counsel for Justice Sanders.
Tonkon, Trop, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Peter H. Koehler, Jr., Donald H. Marmaduke, Steven Wilker, Portland, Counsel for Comm. on Judicial Conduct.
GROSSE, Justice.[*]
A Justice of the State Supreme Court, as any judge, is required to maintain the appearance of impartiality. Doing so…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brown v. HartlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ernest N. Morial v. Judiciary Commission of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TurcoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- MS Com'n on Judicial Perf. v. WilkersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re HammermasterWashington Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.