Latenser v. Tarmac Int'l, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony Rex Gabbert, Judge
Tarmac International, Inc. appeals a motion court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration. At issue is the arbitration provision in Tarmac's employment agreement with respondent Stephen Latenser. Tarmac alleges three points of error. First, it argues the court's invalidation of the arbitration provision erroneously relied on the notice requirements of Section 435.460, RSMo 2000, when the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts Missouri law. Second, Tarmac argues the court lacked authority to adjudicate the arbitration provision's validity, because the incorporated American Arbitration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State ex rel. Pinkerton v. FahnestockSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Esser v. Anheuser-Busch, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Fogelsong v. Joe Machens Auto. Grp., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- David Holm v. Menard, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Hampton S. Brown v. Gojet Airlines, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Purvi Gandi-Kapoor v. Hone Capital LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.