Griffin v. Google
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Brunswick Division CASIMIR P. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, 2:19-CV-132 v. TAMMY JERNIGAN, Defendant. ORDER This is a pro-se action for copyright infringement, breach of contract, and various tort claims. See generally Dkt. No. 2. The only defendant successfully served after frivolity review— Defendant Tammy Jernigan—failed to answer, and so, pursuant to Plaintiff Casimir Griffin’s motion, the Clerk entered default. Dkt. No. 22. Plaintiff moved for default judgment and—at the Court’s instruction, dkt. no. 25 at 3—filed a brief in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Anheuser-Busch v. Irvin P. Philpot, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.