Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2008No. CV06120780; A136658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff, personal representative of the estate of Mabel F. Hobart (decedent), appeals, challenging the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Jack L. Holt and J.H.S.O. Corporation, on plaintiffs wrongful death claims arising out of decedent’s vaccine-related death, which occurred after she received an influenza vaccination administered by defendant Holt, an employee of defendant J.H.S.O. Defendants moved for summaiy judgment, asserting that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Vaccine Act), 42 USC sections 300aa-l to 300aa-34,1 bars plaintiffs state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Schafer v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erin Holmes v. Merck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API