Pair v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this complaint in two counts, malicious use of process (Count 1) and malicious abuse of process (Count 2). Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted as to both counts. Held:
We affirm. To recover for malicious use of process, the following requisite elements must be shown: (1) prosecution of a civil action with malice; (2) such prosecution was without probable cause; (3) a termination of the proceedings in favor of the defendant; and (4) the prosecution of the process caused: (a) arrest of the person; (b) a seizure of his property; or (c) other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davison-Paxon Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Jacksonville Paper Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Price v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- French v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lane Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Pugh v. Frank Jackson Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Taylor v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Easley v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Bell v. King, Phipps & Associates, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.