Legal Opinion
Peabody Landscape Construction Inc. v. Schottenstein
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 18, 2007No. 2:05-CV-1099, 2:05-CV-1100PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
FROST, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court for consideration of Motions to Dismiss (Doc. # 6 in Case No. 2:05-1099; Doc. # 9 in Case No. 2:05-1100) 1 filed by Defendants William Schottenstein and Arshot Investment Corporation (“Defendants”), Memo-randa in Opposition (Doc. # 7 in Case No. 2:05-1099; Doc. #10 in Case No. 2:05-1100) filed by Plaintiff Peabody Landscape Construction (“Plaintiff’), and reply memo-randa. (Doc. #8 in Case No. 2:05-1099; Doc. # 11 in Case No. 2:05-1100) For the reasons that follow, the Court finds Defendants’ motions (Doc. # 6 in Case No.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Church Joint Venture v. Blasingame (In re Blasingame)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Culberson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC dba Mr. CooperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Elton F. Alexander, et al. v. Pacific Western Bank, et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Merletti v. E-Merging Techs. Grp., Inc., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.