Legal Opinion
Kendrick v. Lynaugh
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 13, 1990No. A14-89-966-CVPublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s pro se in forma pauperis action as frivolous. We affirm.
On June 26, 1989, appellant sued appel-lees under Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 106.001 and entitled his complaint “Tort Claims.” On August 24, 1989, upon motion of appellees, the trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to Tex.Civ.PRAc. & Rem.Code Ann. § 13.001.
In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing appellant’s application for an injunction without a hearing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Isiah Carl Green v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Johnson v. LynaughTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Vinson v. BurgessTexas Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Lentworth v. Trahan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Hickman v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Bohannan v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Aguilar v. Chastain, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
- Ralph O. Douglas v. Marisa A. Moffett and Kyle A. Thornton, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.