United States v. Espinosa

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS RAWLES JONES, JR., United States Magistrate Judge.

These cases are before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss. Motions to dismiss were previously granted in the Espinosa and Crank cases after an eviden tiary hearing, and the Government moved for reconsideration. In response, the court vacated those dismissals and conducted an additional evidentiary hearing. Defendants Gipson, Ware, and Bates were also before the court at that time and had also filed motions to dismiss. The court took evidence respecting all five defendants at the second evidentiary hearing, and…