Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Milliken & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1982No. Nos. 81-1823 to 81-1825 and 82-1240PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:

This is an antitrust case in which the district court found a continuing horizontal antitrust conspiracy to stabilize and maintain production royalties on false twist machines and to monopolize the United States market for these machines.1 The core of the conspiracy was a 1964 settlement agreement of certain patent litigation then pending between Leesona Corporation (a non-party to the present case) and defendants which had the effect, as found by the district court, of stabilizing and maintaining the royalties charged by the coconspirators. After we modified…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Susan Labram Bart Labram v. James HavelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Loran W. Robbins, and Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Baltimore Football Club, Inc. (Baltimore Colts), Buffalo Bills, Inc., Chargers Football Co. (San Diego Chargers), Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc., Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc., Detroit Lions, Inc., Five Smiths, Inc. (Atlanta Falcons), Green Bay Packers, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc., New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., New Orleans Saints Louisiana Partnership, New York Football Giants, New York Jets Football Club, Inc., Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc., Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., Pro-Football, Inc. (Washington Redskins), Efk Sports, Ltd., Sued Herein as Rocky Mountain Empire Sports, Inc. (Denver Broncos), St. Louis Football Cardinals Co., San Francisco Forty-Niners, Seattle Professional Football (Seattle Seahawks), and Tampa Bay Area Nfl Football, Inc. (Tampa Bay Buccaneers), Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross Claimant-Appellee v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API