Legal Opinion
Estrada v. RPS, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2005No. B169675, B172164, B173446PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*978Opinion
VOGEL, J.
This is a class action in which the class was conditionally certified, subject to responses to questionnaires approved by the court and sent to the tentatively certified class. Some potential members did not respond at all, others provided inadequate responses, and all of those people were dismissed from this action. Meanwhile, the named plaintiffs and those who did respond to the questionnaires proceeded to trial, established liability, and are now in the midst of the damages phase of their bifurcated trial. At the same time, the named plaintiffs, purportedly acting on behalf…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Rebney v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sharp v. Next Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Safaie v. Jacuzzi Whirlpool Bath, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gregory D. v. Linda D.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Estrada v. RPS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.