Legal Opinion

State v. Cianelli

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1980No. Nos. 12927, 13051PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants bring these consolidated appeals from their respective judgments of conviction for delivery of cocaine. The sole issue is the constitutionality of the legislature’s classification of cocaine as a Schedule II controlled substance. I.C. §§ 37-2701(o)(4) and -2707(b)(4). In particular, defendants maintain that the legislature’s classification of cocaine as a narcotic for regulatory and penalty purposes is in conflict with constitutional principles of due process, equal protection, and cruel and unusual punishment. Defendants cite Illinois and Michigan cases, e. g., People v. McCabe,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. HobbsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. McNeelyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. Randy BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API