Berry v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from District Court, Muskogee County; John U. King, Judge. Arthur. Berry and Iiarrison Kimble were convicted of grand larceny, and they appeal. On question of variance: People v. Buelna, 81 Cal. 135; State v. Hayes, 98 Iowa, 619. On admissibility of ■confessions: Dotson v. State, 88 Ala. 208; State v. Leonard, 3 Ore. 157; Thompson v. State, 19 Tex. App. 593; State v. Meekins,. 4-1 La. Ann. 543. Instruction on presumption of innocence: Campbell v. State, 100 Ga. 271.
1Opinion of the Court
BICHABDSON, Judge.
In this case the information charged that plaintiffs in error “unlawfully, fraudulently, stealthily and feloniously did take, steal and carry away eighteen-hundred dollars, good and lawful -money of the Hnited States, the property of one Milton Bagsdale, with the unlawful and felonious intent to then and there deprive him, the said Milton Bagsdale,-of the property aforesaid, and to convert the same to their own use.”. The evidence for the state showed that Milton Bagsdale lost a pocket book containing eighteen-hundred dollars, and that plaintiffs in' error found it; that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hauk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.