White Plains Housing Authority v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The Zoning Board of Appeals has not stated any facts in the resolution authorizing the erection of the garage, and those facts which can be ascertained from the record do not establish that unnecessary hardship or difficulty is imposed upon the owner by the zoning ordinance. (Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N. Y. 71.)
The board was bound by the zoning ordinance adopted after the hearing but before the determination. (Matter of Cherry [Isbister], 201 App. Div. 856, affd. 234 N. Y. 607.) That ordinance did not provide for the erection of new buildings in nonconforming areas. (§§ 5, 7.) The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Boardwalk & Seashore Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Fox Lane CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gramatan Hills Manor, Inc. v. ManganielloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Franks v. DiricoMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997