Legal Opinion

McBride v. Rea

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Superior Court of Detroit. The testimony having been taken in open court, no case was settled, as required, within the period prescribed by the statute.

Read the full summary

Appeal in Chancery from Superior Court of Detroit. The testimony having been taken in open court, no case was settled, as required, within the period prescribed by the statute. Subsequently, however, at request of defendants and appellants, the judge of the court below certified up a transcript of the minutes of the stenographer who had taken down the testimony, as the whole evidence in the cause, but the certificate failed to state or show that a case had- been regularly settled.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

denied the motion, but granted leave to complainant, if not satisfied with the proofs as returned, to have the case resettled.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miley v. Grand Traverse Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hill v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897