Hill v. Hill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Simpson, J., presiding. Case by Bridget Hill against Matilda Hill for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s husband. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brought error. On motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a motion to dismiss a writ -of error, based upon the ground that the writ was not returned on or before the return day, and upon the ground that no bill of exceptions has been properly settled in the case.
*634The first objection might be overlooked, on the authority of Woodmansie v. Hollon, 16 Mich. 379, and McBride v. Rea, 33 Mich. 347, if the bill of exceptions had been regularly settled.
It appears that the case was tried before Judge Simpson, sitting at the time in the Wayne circuit court, and the bill of exceptions was settled before Judge Hosmer. The statute (2 How. Stat. § 7613)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Oliver v. TownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- McBride v. ReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Woodmansie v. HollonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meer v. MeerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926