Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Tahlequah v. Lake Region Electric, Cooperative, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 2002No. 95,563Published

1Dissent

OPALA, J.,

with whom WATT, V.C.J., KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., join, dissenting.

¶ 1 The court holds today that a municipal condemnor's right of eminent domain (to compel the sale of an electrical-generation system) is enforceable by a "special statutory proceeding" whose prosecution does not qualify as rested upon a "cause of action." Only the latter stands protected by the provisions of Art. V § 52, Ok. Const.,1 from retro*472spective legislative tampering.2 I cannot accede to this view. The Constitution's § 52 shield protects from retrospective repeal all those claims for which the courts are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Elliott v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Board of Law Library Trustees v. State Ex Rel. PetuskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API