Legal Opinion

Browne v. Catawba County Department of Social Services

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1974No. 7425DC446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

While respondents assign numerous errors, we find it necessary only to consider respondents’ third assignment for the determination of this appeal. The third assignment is to the failure of the court to direct a verdict in respondents’ favor. Since the case was tried without a jury, with the court the finder of the facts, a motion for directed verdict was improper; nevertheless, we shall treat respondents’ motion as a motion for an involuntary dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41 (b) in order to pass on the merits of the questions sought to be raised. Neff v. Coach Co., 16 N.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pegram-West, Inc. v. Hiatt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oxendine v. Catawba County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Bowling v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Lawyers Title Insurance v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Oxendine v. Catawba County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API