Legal Opinion
Antonelli v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 2009No. Civil Action 07-2016 (CKK)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
In what remains of this action brought pro se under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has renewed its motion for summary judgment as to counts 8, 10, 11 and 13 of the complaint. 1 Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition, BOP’s reply and the relevant parts of the record, the Court will grant in part and deny in part BOP’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court previously determined that BOP had not met its burden under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Petrucelli v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Boehm v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hammouda v. United States Department of Justice Office of Information PolicyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Allen v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Gamboa v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.