Legal Opinion

Perwitz v. Irvindale Farms Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 26, 1949No. 32466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Section 207 (a) of 29 U. S. C. A. provides in part as follows: “No employer shall, except as otherwise provided in this section, employ any of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce—(3) for a workweek longer than 40 hours . .• unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of the hours above specified at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he is employed.”

Subsection (c) of said Code section is in part as follows: “In. the case of an employer engaged in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waialua Agricultural Co. v. Ciraco ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belton v. Columbus Finance & Thrift Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Yogurt Master, Inc. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. National Advertising Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. National Advertising Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Yogurt Master, Inc. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API