Legal Opinion

Holdhusen v. Schaible

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1932No. File Nos. 7324-25PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

J. F. -Holdhusen, as administrator of the estate of Louis A. Warnecke, deceased, instituted action against the defendant under the Death by Wrongful Act Statute (Rev. Code 1919, § 2929). Emma Warnecke, wife of decedent, also brought an action to recover from the defendant damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while she was riding in an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. The two- actions, arising out of the same accident, were -by the agreement of the parties consolidated for the purposes of trial. The trial below resulted in a verdict and judgment for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barger v. ChelponSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Robinson v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  3. Mitchell v. RaymondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Munson v. RupkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Carlson v. JohnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cohen v. KaminetskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Miller v. Baken Park, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API