Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Kenney
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1998No. Nos. CV 96-1098(ADS), CV 96-2073(ADS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiff, David C. Tucker (“Tucker” or the “plaintiff’), initiated these separate actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants Patricia Kenney and the Legal Aid Society (“Kenney” and “Legal Aid”; collectively, “the Legal Aid defendants”) characterize Tucker’s complaints as “somewhat incoherent- and inartfully drawn. It is difficult to ascertain what the plaintiff is attempting to claim as well as the relief he is seeking.” (Affirmation of Leonard Weinstock, at ¶3). While the Court agrees that is difficult to discern the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kramer v. Time Warner IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- De Oliveira v. Tenet HealthcareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Doroz v. Delorio's Foods Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Saye v. NIO Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022