Legal Opinion
Schmuck v. Menees
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2013No. 13-CA-557PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge.
12PIaintiffs-appelIants, Gia Schumck and Louis G.B. Dumser, III (“the Dumsers”), appeal the trial court’s November 29, 2012 judgment dismissing their petition for red-hibition, breach of contract and negligence against defendants-appellees, Martha Me-nees and Merrill P. Kardon (“the Kar-dons”), after a bench trial on the merits. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 25, 2003, the Dumsers filed a petition, asserting claims of redhibition, breach of contract and negligence, against the Kardons,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RRSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Britney Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Newton v. DongieuxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Flanagan v. CrockerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Williams v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Reed v. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.