Legal Opinion
Newton v. Dongieux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 2014No. 13-CA-776PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge.
|2In this redhibition case, Defendants/sellers, Gene Dongieux, Sr. and Rhonda Dongieux, appeal a judgment finding them liable to Plaintiffs/purchasers, William Newton and Elaine Newton, for damages in the amount of $50,815.00 and attorney’s fees in the amount of $42,182.50, plus court costs and judicial interest. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs, the Newtons, filed a petition for damages on October 9, 2007 seeking damages in redhibition and breach of contract. They alleged that Defendants, the Dongieuxes,1 failed to disclose…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Shelton v. Standard/700 AssociatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Ollis v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jeffers v. ThorpeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flanagan v. CrockerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hernandez v. Chisesi Investments, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Reed v. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Reed v. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Wimsatt v. JaberDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024