Legal Opinion

State v. Dubrock

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 11, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal concerns the validity of the trial court’s decision to force defendant Alton Dubrock to trial without an attorney. This situation apparently resulted from the application of a local rule prohibiting continuances in all cases except for “compelling health reasons.” In this instance, however, the record shows that the trial judge failed to hold an indigency hearing as required by T.C.A. § 40-2017(b), and that he put the defendant to trial without securing a valid waiver of his right to counsel. As a consequence, Dubrock’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. People v. AlengiColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Dennis R. Bolze v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API